the Austrian courts had not breached with conviction against a woman’s right to freedom of expression.
in 2009, had kept the Austrian in the order of the right-wing party FPÖ, two seminars on the topic of “basics of Islam”. They went to the marriage between Mohammed and his wife Aisha, whom he married, according to Tradition, when she was still a child. According to the Strasbourg court, the Austrian said to Mohammed, “now happy times with children a little” and “A 56-Year-old and a six year old? […] As we call it, if it is pedophilia?”. Betsidney
The boundaries of objective debate were exceeded
A Vienna court sentenced the woman to pay a fine in the amount of 480 euros. The wife appealed but failed. She saw the right to freedom of expression violated and complained in Strasbourg.
The European court of human rights did not follow your line of reasoning, however. The Austrian courts had carefully weighed the rights of the woman with the rights of others to protection of their religious feelings. In doing deneme bonusu so, you have come to the conclusion that the woman exceeded the limits of an objective debate. Their attacks threatened, therefore, the religious peace religious peace in Austria. Both Austria and the Complainant may challenge the verdict within three months.
In tris/dpa Mohammed a pedophile prophet European court of human rights (ECtHR)
