Already in the circle Committee was in favor of Martin Schröter his application to the nose. In the district Council, it was not the FDP-man different. His Initiative to complement the decision to “glyphosate-free district” in March, was rejected at the meeting in Murnau with lock, stock and barrel.
County – the following is included Schröters proposal: The district will offer tenants of circle, own land, have a current (old) lease agreement, to voluntarily waive plant protection products (PPP). For the farmer with a plaque or certificate for his exemplary Act should be awarded. Currently, there are 240 farms, the areas of the County farm, and a lease contract have been completed. Of the 240 contracts heuer 72 have been changed or newly completed in compliance with the district’s decision by March. 168 not remain, where this is not the case.
management discourages Initiative
The administration advised for a number of reasons, to follow Schröters Initiative. How would updated reports in the course of the next few years, successive lease contracts. In addition, an award for farmers who cultivate a circle of their own areas, unequal treatment. And although such farmers have leased no areas of the circle. Apart from that plays after the presentation of Peter straw, the water, the head of the Lower nature conservation authority, glyphosate in the agricultural sector in the district has virtually no role: “even earlier and now even less.” In addition, most County-owned land to habitat areas where the use of PSM is already prohibited by law. “The proposal is well-intentioned,” said straw to the water, “but we don’t recommend to do that. Running on Empty, and caused a lot of work“. Schröter was not able to understand, however, that “where there’s a unbearable is Dinamobet more strain”. Its district Council colleagues expressed criticism. Tessy Lödermann (Alliance 90/The Greens) called the foray of the FDP representative “superfluous”. From the point of view of Nicholas Onnich (Free voters), it was a “typical Schröter-request, nothing know, but to talk”. Josef Köpf (COD/FLB) requested finally, to end the debate. The majority joined him in the business. Their Initiative was rejected. Only Schröter himself spoke at the end for his own advance. roy
