The “wise” feel that many of the provisions laid down by the text “infringe” on several fundamental freedoms.
The constitutional Council censored this Friday, the essence of the law LREM providing “security measures” for the detained terrorists from prison, finding that many of the provisions laid down by the text “infringe” on several fundamental freedoms.
In their decision, the Sages believe that these measures, which were to be pronounced according to the “particular dangerousness” of the inmate, “affect the freedom to come and go, and the right to respect for private life and the right to lead a normal family life”.
READ ALSO >> Terrorism : the security measures to be controversial against the threat of out of prison
summer Offer : Take advantage of the special offer 2 months for 1€ I subscribe
ALSO READ >> These 150 convicted for terrorism, who will soon be out of jail
measures deemed to be contrary to the fundamental freedoms
This proposal for a controversial law had been definitively adopted at the end of July by the national Assembly. In the Face of controversy, the minister of Justice and ex-lawyer Eric Dupond-Moretti was arguing for a “solution equilibrium” and had assured not to have been taken “suddenly a blinding madness liberticidal”.
The text was open to the judicial authority the possibility of imposing for five or ten years for people convicted of terrorism offences, at the end of their sentence, the obligation to respond to the convocations of the sentencing judge, to establish his residence in a determined place, of prohibitions to enter into a relationship and seem in some places, and still be under the obligation of pointing so that, subject to the agreement of the person, the wearing of an electronic bracelet. These measures should be limited to persons sentenced to penalties in excess of five years of imprisonment.
In its decision, the constitutional Council has detailed the measures it deems to be contrary to the fundamental freedoms. “As is the case in particular of the obligation to establish his residence in a determined place, of the obligation to present themselves periodically to the police or to the gendarmerie units, up to three times per week, the ban on engaging in certain activities, prohibition to enter into a relationship with certain people or be in certain places, categories of places or areas, and the obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of a health care, social, educational or psychological”, write to the Wise, censoring, therefore, the essence of the law.
Read our complete file
The terrorist threat in France
Terrorism : the security measures to be controversial against the threat of the outgoing prison State, school, sport… A report of the Senate-alarm of the “radicalization of islamist” The la Défense district and briefly cordoned off after a call, disturbing
The only article of the proposed law that is not censored by the Board relates to a secondary provision, which concerns the socio-judicial follow-up of inmates released from prison.
