A calls for the reduction of the dog is failed expensive. In the course of the budget deliberations to enforce Stefan Zöllner (village community/DG), the second dog must be less paid. The great majority of the municipal Council did not want to go with them.
Turks field –Who holds in Türkenfeld a dog, pays 50 Euro a year. A second is added, 150 euros are due – in publican’s eyes too much, and is significantly above the average of the neighboring municipalities. There is no reason to demand three times the rate. “This is arbitrary and excessive.” Tax collector requested a reduction of 100 Euro.
In the sense of the Animal’s well-being
a citizen had complained recently in the current quarter of an hour about the high tax rates in türkenfeld and comparison with called numbers. Kottgeisering, Schöngeising and Grafrath for the first dog 40 Euro, for the second 100. Apply the village does not distinguish at all between the First and second dog, but demanded for each animal 51,20 Euro.
publican argued that there is a “Trend for the second dog”, that is, in fact, also in the sense of the Animal’s well-being. For a single person with a pet will mean an important social component. The professional holder is, however in the house all day, be it for the dog better, “if a PAL is for.”
colleague Robert Miller said. The tax rate for the first dog you’ve kept intentionally low (“the pensioner should have his dog cheap”), but more dogs would be a burden.
sum should be remembered, represent a hurdle
Vice-mayor Emanuel Staffler (CSU), why they had been given at the time the second dog tax is as high. “The 150 Euro a hurdle for the luxury second dog should.” Mayor Pius Keller (CSU) called to the councils of the “big discussion” to the memory, which had led to the current tax rates.
a few years Ago had rocked the mood between dog owners and the Rest of the population, in part caused by dirty sidewalks, and poorly-behaved four-legged friends. At the same time, there was the part of the individual pet owner is the requirement that the dog tax be completely abolished, because she was antisocial.
dog toilets have improved the situation
The municipality was looking for at the time, in a specially convened meeting of the dialogue with the dog owners. These were clear on the subject of tax, the municipality in turn, in high-traffic walking paths, dog toilets. These have improved, so the unanimous opinion in the Council, the Situation significantly.
“I would like to stick with what was decided after a long discussion,” said Staffler. With three votes against publican’s application was rejected.
Also interesting: the Drama of death shot on dog: the hunter
speaks
