The 44-year-old rapper filed court documents on Friday, February 25th by his lawyer and was obtained by Us Weekly. His comments regarding social media posts were slammed by KKW Beauty founder, and West asks for the comments to be stricken.
On Thursday, February 24, US obtained court documents where Kardashian, 41, replied to her husband’s objections to her request for a separate trial to declare her single . He also provided a list of conditions that had to be met before they would agree earlier in the month.
In she stated that Skims founder Kanye had been spreading misinformation about our private family matters as well as co-parenting via social media. This has caused emotional distress.”
West’s lawyer argues that West’s comments cannot be kept on record because she did not provide the posts with her statement.
Kim claims that she found something online, allegedly by Kanye, and describes the posts in her declaration to be misinformation,” according to Friday’s filing from Kanye’s attorney. The declaration does not include the social media posts. Kim had to provide evidence of the social media posts and prove that they were written by Kanye.
The comments could be removed from the record because they were not submitted as evidence. Kardashian could still make her statement by providing the Instagram posts in question.
It is necessary to prove that Kanye wrote his Instagram posts which contained alleged screenshots of text conversations with his estranged spouse. The Yeezy designer may have made it very simple. On February 13, he posted a photo holding up a pad of legal paper with the statement “My account has not been hacked.”
This does not mean that “Donda”, the rapper, is denigrating his Instagram posts. It’s a simple legal step that was apparently overlooked and must be taken care of.
This applies to their prenuptial agreements. “The presumption that the agreement is invalid exists until it is rebutted at court or ratified by the parties. The legal docs state that we are still in the early stages of this case and no ratification has taken place.
Before they tied the knot in May 2014 the couple signed a document. However, at this stage in their divorce case, the prenuptial agreement has not been ratified. This doesn’t necessarily mean West disagrees completely with the terms of their prenup. It is simply that they have not reached that point in the divorce process.
This is because the Grammy winner demanded that the Keeping Up With The Kardashians alum be made legally single. He opposed her petition with concerns regarding their custody , and property agreements which have not been handled.
West stipulates that his ex-partner “will not transfer assets from any trust they have created together.” He also advocated for the “right to reimbursement” to be preserved if one of them dies prior to a final property judgement being made.
Kardashian was also asked to “waive all marital priviliges should she marry” until a custody determination has been made. Kardashian’s lawyer described the stipulation as “unprecedented” and said that any communication between them could be included in court records. According to Kardashian’s lawyers, West wants “to make it difficult or prevent Ms. Kardashian from remarrying” after their split.
The model’s legal team responded on Wednesday to claim that his three conditions were “not sanctioned” but have not proved they are necessary to protect “his interests” or “the status quo.” The reason is that the Prenuptial Agreement governs the nature of their assets, income and claims to reimbursement.
According to the prenuptial agreement, the ex-couple kept their finances separate from one account for their children’s expenses. They have four children: North, 8, Saint 6, Chicago, 4, Psalm 2, and Chicago, 6.
West’s Friday reply notes that they would have to ratify this prenuptial agreement in order for it to be legally binding.
Kardashian’s lawyers also suggested that West wants to “prevent or make it difficult” for Ms. Kardashian from remarrying in the future.
