No one in the government had this year with such an explosive dossier to make it as a minister, Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and food quality). The stikstofprobleem capacity to burn up almost all the time. In a conversation with NU.nl look, she’s back. “I have been with everything I’ve got in this case.”
now, it Is the decision of the Council of State on the 29th of may, which led to the end of the stikstofbeleid now that’s a blessing or a curse of nature? Rowlands (42) struggles sometimes with the question of, do not acknowledge them. “A blessing for us, because we realize that we have more and more to nature, and restoring nature to do so.”
“On the other hand, is a curse. People think: ‘yes, hello, this is the nature of the supreme good? We’re also getting in the way. I would be sorry to see the nature of the fault of the story.”
It is less than had been Rowlands and her time is mainly devoted to the promotion of its vision for the kringlooplandbouw, a new kind of farmers that are better for humans, animals and the environment. But that is where the majority of the conversations are no longer about. “It’s stikstofdossier controlled currently all I’m doing,” the deputy prime minister of the british national Party-the house. The stikstofcrisis stresses, according to Rowlands, the need for kringlooplandbouw.
as for The farmers, are responsible for most of the stikstofuitstoot, could see the storm already in place and that the stikstofmaatregelen to sign that would come. The livestock contract? Farmers are bought out? A great deal of uncertainty and anger, leading in October to a large and impressive protest, a stone’s throw away from the station.
“When I am myself in doubt, go with the alarm bells off. I’m pretty brutal to myself,”
Secretary: Carola Schouten
“These are discussions that are already out there. That is, Natura 2000 sites have been here for a long time.”
“That farmers are noticing now that they are close to a protected nature reserve, where they are sometimes not able to.”
“If you’re a farmer wants to stay, then you need a farmer can keep. It may, however, mean that you have to have something on your farm or at your farmers will have to do.”
“Well, you know, reasons. It’s going to be in conversation with each other. We need to work together to talk about how we’re exactly going to do that.”
“Then you’re going to there is a lot that people don’t want to be. That’s not my experience so far. I grew up in the vicinity of a Natura 2000 site, which calls, however, there were also, though, that were pretty intense.
As jack said immediately: “that’s great offer, thank you so much, we have to go. They have to know that there are options. You can be in a different place, beyond the farmers, perhaps not until you are stable, you may want to stop it.
You will be flying with it now for a long time, as if the farmers are not interested. First, start with what the person does want it.”
“yes, There are still many steps to be put in that kind of conditions to think about. That seems to me to be more productive, then the government has to say about what is best for the farmers. So, I don’t want to work.”
Schouten and prime minister mark Rutte in a meeting with the farmers concerning the impact of the stikstofuitspraak at the Catshuis on november 13. (Pro Shots).
“No.” This is going to be about the work of the people. Some of the companies have been over the last few years with the family. The government underestimated, sometimes people have to experience when you have power over something that is really close to them.”
“That’s right. But then, you have the option to voluntarily not buy it, as in the pig industry. Do you have someone in perspective? Thus, it should be a government function. Not that we put rules on it, good luck with it.”
“The one is a change in progress, and the other one says: so what happens now? For the latter group, I understand that change is not always easy. There has been quite a lot has happened in the field of agriculture.
you can Think of on the fosfaatproblemen, rules for the stables, and the manure. Farmers have experienced that as they become more and more limited. That is, I get it, because they will always have to deal with a changed situation.
We sat down on the edge of what is possible to. As soon as you’re on the edge, it is a kind of crashactie is needed in order to get everything back is to restore it. That often goes hand in hand with a lot of pain and suffering.”
“The government underestimated, sometimes people have to experience when you have the power to exercise”
Secretary: Carola Schouten < / p> “for The first time to Arrive, there were still no action from the government on nitrogen. This was basically due to the fact that the livestock population has been halved, had to be out by the Dutch political party D66, in the usa.”
“how can anyone in this manner. I don’t understand these emotions. I saw it, especially the farmers, that in order to rating early and put aside for a one-sided view. These farmers ensure the food is of a very high quality. However, if you are contrasting it with what it is indeed is in the lead of the shot.
It will produce at the lowest possible cost, and to pay even the bill for that. One of my toughest jobs is what is the earning power of these farmers is improving.”
“Well. And according to the company. There are a few areas where the producer is a small part of the total margin of the chain to get it.”
you Won 3 Of Foreign exchange.
AvatarAuteurLodewijkAMoment of plaatsen07:46 pm – June 17, 2019
“Not everyone has the ability to charge more for food to pay for it. I may not be in everyone’s wallet and watch. It depends on the family. On the other hand, the percentage of our income that we spend on food is really low. That is, in the last few years has declined and is now approximately 10 percent of the time.”
“That’s a lot of general information. ‘The farmers’. I will say there is a lot of. These discussions were intense, sometimes beautiful, sometimes exciting.”
the Plans of the farmers ‘
some farmers now have thirteen of the organizations are united in the Agricultural Cooperative, presented the plans for the stikstofuitstoot down. As Rowlands said that they didn’t have any plans to acquire, it was indicated by the farmers are fierce. Rowlands was a “threat to the legal certainty,” the one and the other is to do it.
That was the situation prior to the interview, followed by a conversation between Rowlands and the Farming Collective that the parties have agreed on a number of occasions, but the plans of the farmers are still not over.
“The farmers, and all stikstofrechten in the sector will continue to be, but it can’t be all of it. I’ve had to deal with a court ruling that the stikstofuitstoot down,” says Schouten.
“I’ve got the extra cash is freed up. Maybe it’s not the amount that they are asking for, but it’s still going in that direction. They want to have the same stikstofbeleid of the provinces of the roman Empire. I have weeks of hard work, and that is now accomplished.”
“I always take steps in that direction, but it’s not as if I was the farmers, and all of it.”
from left to right: Ministers, Cora van Nieuwenhuizen (Traffic), Rowlands, prime minister Mark Rutte in the netherlands and Stientje van Veldhoven (Domestic) present in the stikstofmaatregelen, including the snelheidsverlaging to 100 km/h. (Pro Shots).
“I’m whatever I have to in this case. For me, the most important thing is that I find myself in the mirror, look at myself, and can account for it. If I had to be in doubt, the alarm bells off. I’m pretty brutal to myself.”
“Well, you know, I don’t know if it is cruel it is. I will take a look at a lot of points where I was the farmers, however, in order to come within the scope of that court’s ruling. I think this would be realistic to call it.
for example, If I am ever back in that time period, I hope that I have made is that agriculture and nature, real and with each other, go hand in hand. In such a way as to allow us to enjoy our food and the farmers, there’s an appreciation for them.”
See also: – New: ‘reduce Speed to 100 km / h in a rotmaatregel’