in The judgment of the court of justice in The Hague, that the State has a duty to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases, will remain in effect. That is, the supreme court on Friday will be determined. The decision of the Urgenda-a judgment, a reduction of at least 25 per cent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels, which is the final.
The State must be final by the end of 2020, the greenhouse gas emissions compared to the 1990 level by 25 per cent, have been reduced. Climate change is being seen as a real danger, where the citizens need to be protected. From the calculations it appears that the government’s goal is not to get. The case was brought in 2013 by the citizens ‘ platform Urgenda initiated.
Both the district court (in 2015), if the court in 2018, stated earlier, that the smaller the CO emission is in compliance with the “duty of care” of the State.
Climate change is expected to be a real threat against which citizens need to be protected. It is in addition to the self-imposed CO2 targets set by the government.
The Dutch government, was contrary to the decision in the court of cassation because they wanted to know whether or not the court, to the same extent in the world of politics can sit down. The supreme court is a court that is not in content, to a business look, but the judges of the law and the rules of procedure are properly applied. That is a question, in this case, a ” yes ” answer.
The court, said earlier that the Netherlands is bound to international treaties and conventions, which are legally valid and, therefore, judicial scrutiny by the court in the Netherlands. The Council concurs with this.
The case began in 2013, with a charge of Urgenda. The citizens ‘ platform called for an appropriate climate would have come out and said that the government is unduly acted on by the klimaatdoelen that is internationally agreed upon not to promote it.
The Council stressed on Friday that “there is already a high degree of agreement that an urgent reduction of emissions is needed in order for global warming to go.” “The State has the obligation to take all appropriate measures, to the imminent danger of combat”.
” History is written #klimaatzaak @Urgenda).
AvatarAuteururgendaMoment of plaatsen10:07 am – december 20, 2019 the country is not on track with the CO2 target,
In november, the Planning bureau for the living Environment (PBL) was calculated for the State of the klimaatdoelen by 2020, as it stands, I still don’t get. Before the end of next year, will be a 23 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions – of which CO2 is the primary gas is ejected in relation to the gaging year 1990.
The rate, however, with a great deal of uncertainty around them. The PBL has established a range of 19 to 26 per cent greenhouse gas emission saving by the year 2020. For example, the goal of a one-quarter reduction in emissions, with a best eort will be achieved, but that is not the way forward.
In all the 60 seconds of The warming up of the earth’s Government will find additional research
The government is struggling for many years now, and the Urgenda-sentence. Since the PBL at the beginning of this year, for the first time, and warned that the CO2 target would not be met, we are also considering what actions can be taken.
This is the Hemwegcentrale been switched off and there will be a CO2 tax for big business, one of the promises made in the climate deal.
There was a recent decision and order of the speed limit during the daytime on all highways to 100 km / h decrease on top of that. This is a measure of the stikstofuitstoot to be lower, but it can also help to reduce CO2 emissions.
“The goal is to get to the goal,” said prime minister Mark Rutte in the netherlands in January, when he was confronted with the PBL-digit number. For the New, it is important that the CO2-reducing measures are taken, it is not a uitstootstijging in the rest of the world (‘carbon leakage’) will lead. They may not be at the expense of employment.
the New calls in the framework of the right to impose stricter klimaatdoelen.
for example, If the goal is not to be taken includes the imposition of a periodic penalty payment of up to the possibilities.
