The so-called deeltijdontslag, such as that in the previous week, among other things, it was proposed by the commission-the breast-plate, this means that an employer the number of hours in a full-time staff with around 20 per cent lower. It would also mean that the employee, in salary is on the decline.
“Inside maneuverability, does not mean that an employer can say:” next week, I can be yours for a 50 per cent reduction in the hours required and the work is moved to Sittard, the netherlands”, said Johan, a Swimmer, a lawyer and professor of labour law, university of amsterdam, on Thursday, during a hearing of the house of representatives.
“We are thinking at a rate of 20,” says He. The lawyer, wishes to emphasize that, with the deeltijdontslag it is a fixed contract, “agile”, without it being at the expense of contractzekerheid.
He was also a member of the commission-the breast-plate, and it worked so a year and a half of advice would you give to the government about the future of the labour market. The commission has been quite alarming about this. There must be something to be done to bridge the gap between temporary workers and self-employed persons, on the one hand, and of employees with a permanent contract, on the other hand, otherwise, you will reach a point of no return.
See also: Advice to the labour market: flexible labour, at the last minute, the dismissal should be easier to Fix and less fixed, flex, and less flex
in Order not to, among other things, deeltijdontslag is proposed. An employer may, in the case of the economic as against the working of the long-term contracts, to reduce.
they are Also provided with the opportunity to work the hours to suit. Employees must, then, accept, except, if there is a “compelling interest”. The committee understands that the adjustments are all under the heading of ‘internal responsiveness’.
the Alternative is, according to the commission’s resignation
The alternative is in accordance with the commission’s termination of employment. However, it fell in this section is wrong for the trade unions and left-wing parties in the lower house. The labour party leader Lodewijk Asscher, has called the proposal “crazy”. “The problem is not that people have to be sure that the problem is that people tend to be uncertain,” said Asscher.
The commission presents, in its opinion, is not a concrete number by which to be an employer for the duration of a contract of employment may be reduced. “Had we done so,” said He in there now. The commission was concerned with a specific percentage of lot to the world of politics to sit down, and while the advice is correct, if the dot is on the horizon and it is meant to be.
The 20-percent that He is not chosen randomly. Benefit is ESSENTIAL to find the acceptable when there is a 20 per cent salarisverschil between an old and a new job, and the percentage given to social planning.