In an interview with the Voice of The North, the old gentleman retired from the government goes back on its oversights with the HATVP that he called”carelessness”.
Jean-Paul Delevoye spell of its silence. The former “mr. retreats” of the government, responsible for implementing the pension reform but replaced by Laurent Pietraszewski after his “oversights” of the High authority for transparency in public life (HATVP), confides in an interview granted to the Voice of The north. He returned at the end of this course little glory after mu in the silence since his tweet announcing his resignation on 16 December last.
“I had a moment complicated,” he says to explain this absence in the media. The chance wanted that this happens in December : the syndrome Bérégovoy [minister of François Mitterrand, who has committed suicide, editor’s NOTE] has been mitigated by my daughter’s birthday, the family celebrations, the discovery that I was going to have 73 pins, and that it was time that I stop. I took the necessary perspective.”
ALSO READ >> Case Delevoye : behind the scenes of a resignation
Your support is essential. Subscribe for $ 1 support Us
It is also on its omissions which have led him to the resignation. “Embedded in my calendars,” he says, I have neglected my statement of interest of the High Authority for transparency in public life”, justifie-t-il, adding that he had been “careless”.
“I have no complaints”
“as Soon as this sequence has been launched, I’ve learned the lesson and therefore offered my resignation. I didn’t want to undermine the project of pension reform, he had to leave. I have no reproach to make to anyone. The opposition is served, but it is the rule of the game”, he says again.
Read our complete file
Jean-Paul Delevoye, former”mr. retreats” to too many projects
The High Authority for transparency in public life is it effective? Case Delevoye : a report embarrassing and a fourteenth “forgetting” Case Delevoye : the parquet de Paris open a preliminary investigation
Now, it will focus on the world of associations, with bitter memories of the end of his political career : “The violence that I experienced was a way of telling me to give in my place. The role of the former is to accompany the young people, to contribute to the debates. My role is not to provide answers, but to ask the right questions. I saw how, as soon as one approached the power, the hunt was open. I did not want to return to, or serve anyone.”.
